31 October 2013

Happy Halloween!

Thriller playing in the background would be suitable considering the holiday, but oh well! The Mannequin bird never fails to make me smile. This guy has to be one of the grooviest little animals out there.


I was thinking it'd be cool being a bird on Halloween; no teeth = no cavities from so much sugar. Then I remembered this from Series B of QI and decided it probably wouldn't be such a great idea after-all...
"Birds do not like chocolate. It is poisonous, and birds have only 20-30 taste buds, so they could not taste it anyway. A Smartie would kill a small songbird. Chocolate is also poisonous to humans, but the lethal dose is very high (22 pounds). Humans have 9-10,000 taste buds, but new ones grow every five days." (QI - Series B, Episode 2)
Sucks to be a bird then, I guess. Though most of them do have the awesome ability to fly, so I guess it's not all bad, right?

Fun Feathery Facts:
1. The earliest known bird is thought to be the fossil specimen, Aurornis xui.
2. Feathers didn't originate in birds; it is now believed that proto-feathers originated in dinosaurs, and were probably present in Velociraptors... Jurassic Park probably wouldn't have been as terrifying as if they'd known that back-in-the-days.
3. Some birds, such as the Hooded Pitohuis (Pitohui dichrous), are known to be toxic to touch or eat; they produce these toxins from food in their diet.

Toxic and appropriately coloured for this frightful day; the Hooded Pitohuis (Pitohui dichrous). He'd look really cool perched a-top some pumpkins (I wouldn't eat them afterwards, minds) - image from Top5's
4. All birds lay eggs; no living bird species is known to give birth to live young.
5. There is some debate over which bird has made the longest recorded flight, depending upon whether you go by days spent airborne or distance covered. This year, three Alpine Swifts are reported to have spent a non-stop total of 200 days airborne, whilst a female Godwit in 2007 reportedly flew non-stop from Alaska to New Zealand, a journey of 7145 miles (11,500km).
6. The Peregrine falcon (Falco peregrinus) has the fastest dive speed of any bird at a speed of around 200 mph (320 km/h). In 2005, one particular falcon was recorded diving at a top speed of 242 mph (389 km/h).
7. Owls are excellent hunters and can fly more slowly than other birds, and do so almost silently thanks to noise muffling feathers in their wings. Their eyes are large relative to their small skull, but cannot be moved in any direction. Instead, owls can rotate their head 270° to look around.
8. The Potoo (Nyctibius spp.) is another nocturnal bird which relies heavily on their fantastic camouflage. In the day, they sit on tree stumps to avoid detection. They're also pretty comical looking, don't you think? 


"But I don't wanna go to school!" - image from fanpop.
9. The smallest known bird, the Bee Hummingbird (Mellisuga helenae), also produces the smallest eggs of any bird species. The eggs are no bigger than peas, and are lay in a tiny cup-shaped 1 inch (2.5 cm) nest. 
10. Whilst most nocturnal birds have evolved brilliant eyesight, the Kiwi might as well be blind. What it lacks in sight, however, it makes up for in it's ability to smell. Whilst most birds have little or no sense of smell, the kiwi bird's is highly developed

Taken from imgur.

27 October 2013

Critically Endangered - The Philippine Cockatoo

I stumbled across an interesting article by BusinessMirror (2013) on the Red-Vented Cockatoo (Cacatua haematuropygia (IUCN, 2012) during a coach-trip back from visiting friends. Sometimes called the Philippine Cockatoo or Katala, this clever bird is one of the few bird species capable of mimicking human speech. Sadly, the population of these beautiful birds has plummeted rapidly (a decline of 60-90%) (Katala Foundation, 2013) in the last two decades due to anthropogenic activities.


The Red-vented cockatoo is listed as critically endangered on the IUCN Redlist with an estimate of roughly 1000 remaining in the wild, and with the remaining populations fragmented and dispersed across the Philippine islands  (IUCN, 2012). 

The Red-vented Cockatoo, by Edmond Sham on Flickr

Destruction of their natural coastal habitat poses one threat; deforestation and destruction of mangroves has been particularly extensive throughout their range, leaving the remaining populations vulnerable to typhoons (IUCN, 2012). The cockatoos are also persecuted for being agricultural pests, and are sometimes hunted for food (Birdlife, 2013).

Illegal trade of the birds for sale as pets, however, has probably been the largest impact that humans have had upon the species. The Red-vented Cockatoo is highly demanded as a cage-bird, as reflected in the price these birds can reach on the market (US$300 in Manilla, in 2006) (IUCN, 2012), and as such illegal trappers will remove any chicks from nests they come across  (Katala Foundation, 2013)

Thankfully, things are being done to try and stop the decline of this species through the Philippine Cockatoo Conservation Program (PCCP). The PCCP has proposed protecting nests from poaching, restoring destroyed habitats, education and involvement in the community and conservation breeding for re-release as some of their conservation methods. 

23 October 2013

Climate Change 1. - The Big Picture

Being perfectly honest, this is really just an overview; were I to address every impact that climate change has had upon birds, I would be here for a long, long time. Whilst I can and will focus on the finer points in my future posts, here I simply aim to provide a stepping stone. The topic of Climate Change is a long debated one, and the effect that our activities have had upon the climate is one of the reasons why many believe we're entering a new geological time; the Anthropocene.

What is Climate Change, and how do we know it is happening?
In short, Climate Change is a large-scale, global change in patterns of weather and temperature trends over time. As a result of shifting climate zone boundaries, climate change also results in a shift of biodiversity over time.

Athabasca Glacier in Canada is just one of the world's many retreating mountain glaciers that make it hard to deny that our planet is has been warming over the last century - by Maggie T on Flickr
Climate Change can be natural; the earth has experienced both cool periods where ice has been present over the poles, and warmer ice-free periods. Whilst the exact mechanisms for natural climate change are not fully understood, it is believed changes in the earth's orbit (Milankovitch Cycles) (British Geological Society) (Wikipedia, 2013) play a large role. This sort of climate change, however, takes place over thousands of years. Since the beginning of the 20th century global temperature has risen 0.8°C (1.4°F) (UK MetOffice) (US EPA) (Koronowski, 2013). This rapid change is above and beyond natural climate change (IPCC, 2007) and has been attributed to human activities; primarily an increase in atmospheric CO2 (from 280ppm before the industrial revolution (IPCC, 2007to the present value of over 390ppm)(CO2 Now) through the burning of fossil fuels.

This rise in temperature has in turn caused a shift in global precipitation pattens (US EPA). Whilst there has been increased rain observed in the northern hemispheres mid-latitudes, other areas of the globe have suffered increasing drought  (UK MetOffice). Climate change has also brought with it a rapid retreat in mountain glaciers (Oerlemans et al, 1998) (Kaser et al, 2003) , a decline in sea ice and continental ice sheets, and a rise in sea level (Rockström et al, 2011).

Threatened by climate change and stronger, more frequent El Niño cycles; the critically endangered Waved Albatross (Phoebastria irrorata), a migratory sea-bird who's population is believed to have declined by up to 19% in the past 84 years (BirdLife, 2013) - image by Victor Burolla on Flickr
How does climate change impact upon birds?
There is compelling evidence that Climate Change has had a large impact on the behaviour, breeding patterns, breeding ranges (Araújo et al, 2005) and migration patterns of birds (Nature Canada). Earlier springs in northern hemisphere have been associated with an earlier arrival and breeding of birds, and in turn an earlier autumn and winter migration of juveniles (Crick, 2004).

For those birds that don't migrate to warmer climates, the harsher, colder winters may pose the threat of starvation and freezing as they require an increased energy expenditure for birds to keep warm (Crick, 2004). In turn, this could impact breeding success.

Other threats posed to birds, both migratory and non-migratory, include the loss of habitat and food (National Geographic, 2013). Whilst some areas of the world are becoming dryer and suffering from drought, other areas are becoming more 'hospitable'; in Alaska trees are now appearing on the formerly tree-less tundra, and deciduous trees are beginning to replace mountain conifers (O'Hara, 2011) . Whole ecosystems are changing rapidly, and populations of birds unable to adapt to these changes may decline rapidly.

15 October 2013

Two Wings of Terror

I present to you a creature that sounds like it was plucked straight out of a legend. A giant raptor believed to have had a wingspan of roughly 3m (10ft) (Wingspan, 2012)(Warne, 2002), it is a bird that would be perfectly at home in the Lord of the Rings universe.

Though no longer soaring through our skies, Haast's Eagle (Harpagornis moorei) (Wikipedia, 2013)(Holdaway, 1991) was as real as could be, and is possibly the source behind the Maori legend of the monstrous man-eating Pouakai aka. Hokioi (ICR, 2009) (Wehi et al, 2009) (Wingspan, 2012). So, not the sort of creature that would be found flying over the mighty peaks of the Iron Mountains and rescuing Thorin and company from goblins, or plucking Gandalf from the top of the Isengard.

An artists depiction of the Haast's Eagle attacking the New Zealand Moa - image via Wikipedia Commons
I mentioned these amazing birds briefly in my last post, Bird Extinction: The Pre-Industrial Picture. Until humans colonised New Zealand, the only predator of the giant Moa (more than ten-times the eagles' weight) were Haast's Eagles which inhabited the South Island and went extinct at the same time as their primary source of food (Wingspan, 2012).

As is the case with many extant birds of prey, the females were believed to be the larger of sexes with a standing height of almost a metre (Brathwaite, 1992). With a weight of over 14kg for females (Brathwaite, 1992), this monster predator is believed to have been capable of reaching top speeds of approximately 50mph (80 km/h)(Wikipedia, 2013) at which it "...could hit its prey with the force of a 35-pound concrete block dropped from an eight-story building" (Warne, 2002). At such speeds, it would grasp its prey at the rear, as indicated by claw marks on Moa pelvic bones (Holdaway, 1991), and deliver a killing blow to head or neck. 

As a result of it's size, it has also been suggested by scientists that the Haast's Eagle was very near the threshold for flapping flight (BBC); had they been much larger, they would probably have had to rely on gliding. By keeping their wings relatively short and their tails long for their size, the eagles were able to maintain the ability to navigate swiftly through the forests as they hunted (Holdaway, 1991)(Brathwaite, 1992)(Wingspan, 2012). So, good news for a hungry Haast's Eagle, but bad news for any Moa or the unfortunate human...

11 October 2013

Bird Extinction: The Pre-Industrial Picture

Extinction as a result of anthropogenic activities is not something that can be confined to the last century or two; as humans have expanded their reach across the globe, they have been contributing to a loss of biodiversity on Earth for at least 50,000 years (Braje & Erlandson, 2013). Human induced animal extinction rates are believe to be up to a thousand times higher than the natural background rate, and are associated with the loss of around 8500 species of bird since 1600 AD alone (Braje & Erlandson, 2013).

Whilst a loss of species diversity can be seen across the globe, some of the most prominent examples are on the many islands of the South Pacific, where Polynesian expansion across the pacific led to the extinction of many animal species (Pimm et al, 2006). Island populations are especially vulnerable to extinction, as their populations are often small, and may be confined to a minimal area of land. Their isolation also often results in the loss of adaptability to pathogens, predators and competitors that may be introduced, and to the rapid environment change often brought about by humans (Grayson, 2001).

The extinction of endemic flightless birds alongside plants and mammals in Australia coincides with the arrival of humans (Braje & Erlandson, 2013), which may have been visiting the country as early as 22,000 years ago (Flannery & Roberts, 1999), as suggest by a rise in charcoal and a change in tree pollen in the sedimentary record. This has been contributed to anthropogenic deforestation through fire, and not down to climate change (Flannery & Roberts, 1999).

The same applies to New Zealand, which wasn't colonised until much later in the 13th Century (Irwin & Walrond, 2012). Prior to humans living in New Zealand, it was home to many species of endemic birds that are now extinct. 21 species of small landbird are no longer with us today, and alongside them were 11 species of Moas (Braje & Erlandson, 2013) (Grayson, 2001). The only birds known to be totally wingless, the enormous Moa were a family of herbivorous flightless birds. The two largest species, Dinornis robustus and Dinornis novaezelandiae weighed over 200kg, and could reach a height of 3.6m (12ft) if they stood with their neck outstretched (Wikipedia, 2013).

Published in 1879; a photograph of Richard Owen, the director of London's Natural History Museum, standing beside a reconstructed skeleton of Dinornis novaezelandiae - Image via Wikipedia Commons


The only natural predator of the Moa was the Haast's Eagle which was also driven to extinction when the Moa were wiped out completely in just over a century since the Maori populated the islands. Their extinction is believed to be a result of multiple factors, but all are attributed to human activities (BBC, 2009(Grayson, 2001). Before the arrival of our species it is estimated that up to 90% of New Zealand was covered in forested, yet within a few hundred years almost all of the lowland forest had been destroyed, and with it vanished the habitats of the Moa and other animals (Grayson, 2001). Human predation, evidence of which has been gained from many archaeological sites, was another large factor in the Moas disappearance (Holdaway & Jacomb, 2000). Lastly, the unintentional introduction of Polynesian rats (Rattus exulans) is believed to have played a large role in the extinction of birds not only in New Zealand, but across the whole of the South Pacific (Pimm et al, 2006). Whilst it's doubted by many archaeologists that there was direct predation of Moa eggs by the rats, the rodents are likely to have caused competition for food and impacted the vegetation on which the Moa and other landbirds depended (Grayson, 2001).

Madagascar suffered similar losses following human colonisation roughly 2300 years ago; it too was home to two genera of large flightless bird (Mullerornis and Aepyornis) that are often referred to as Elephant Birds which went extinct between 1600 and 1700 AD (Braje & Erlandson, 2013). Aepyornis was the larger of two, and is believed to have reached weights of up 400kg and a height of 3m (10ft). The causes of extinction are less clear, but signs of butchery from archaeological sites suggest humans played a primary role (Burney & Flannery, 2005).

The birds of other remote islands didn't fare much better. Grayson (2001) suggests that, alongside anthropogenic predation, predation by invasive dogs, pigs and Polynesian rats brought to the islands by humans may have been largely responsible for the disappearance of endemic Hawaiian species. Of 17 species of landbird known from archaeological deposits, only four remain on Hawaii today (Braje & Erlandson, 2013). Rats are also believed to be partly responsible for the loss of 6 species of landbird and several seabird colonies, alongside much of the vegetation (through eating nuts and seeds and thus impairing the ability of the plants to reproduce) on Easter island, which in turn contributed to the breakdown of human society on the island (BBC, 2009)(Braje & Erlandson, 2013).

Grayson (2001) raises the possibility that anthropogenic activities may have, in some instances, created habitats for some subsets of bird species which would not be present were it not for such changes. Despite this, the general consensus is that the increased colonisation of Oceania by humans correlates with an increase in avian extinctions. The past extinction of island fauna paints a grim picture; it shows how easy it is for anthropogenic activities to lead to a loss of biodiversity. Unless we try to minimise our impacts and attempt to preserve and conserve the species that have so far survived, many more species of bird may join the mighty Moa. 


New Zealand by Steve Taylor, on Flickr

Cited:

  • Extinctions in Near Time: Causes, Contexts and Consequences - Chapter 10: Late Quaternary Extinctions in Australia (T.F. Flannery & R.G. Roberts, 1999) 

8 October 2013

Welcome!

Welcome! As this is my first post here, I thought I'd let you all know what I'm blogging about and why.

In short, I am here explore and discuss the ways through which human activities have had an impact on the nature (such as habits and migratory patterns), population number and species diversity of birds.

These impacts may be detrimental or positive; whilst there will be cases where I'll be discussing where anthropogenic activity may have been the cause of (or may be leading to) the extinction of certain bird species, I would also like to explore the possibility that our activity may have unintentionally benefited others. Along my journey, I also aim to learn more about what humans can and should do to help preserve our feathered friends - that is, if we should do anything all at?

Critically endangered; the Juan Fernández Firecrown (Sephanoides fernandes), a hummingbird found solely on Robinson Crusoe Island (Wikipedia)(Birdlife) - Photo by hectorgutierrez, on Flickr
Anthropogenic activities may impact birds directly (hunting, for example) or indirectly. Some of the areas I will be exploring over the next few months -to name but a few- will include the past effects of anthropogenic activity on birds, as well as the current affects of urbanisation, agriculture, travel and climate change. 

I am lover of birds (and all other animals), from the beautiful Robin to the 'grotesque' (or glorious, if you're me) Red-Headed Vulture, and from this stems my topic for this blog. Two years ago I was mostly ignorant of their plight; but studying, interacting with my peers and volunteering for a short period with the RSPB over the summer of 2013 has made led to me becoming more concerned about nature and the environment.

In my current position I favour conservation and preservation, and I believe that issues such as climate change and the loss of biodiversity are ones that need to be tackled seriously and effectively. As Simon Barnes (RSPB Birds Magazine, Spring 2013) put it;
"By destroying biodiversity we are imperilling the future of the planet we live on and putting ourselves in grave danger"
At present, almost 200 bird species are listed as 'critically endangered', and many more are 'endangered' or 'at risk'. Estimates of past bird extinctions due to anthropogenic activities are around 116 species since c.1600 (Smith et al, 1993) and 119 since c.1500 (Pimm et al, 2006), and in the last 30 years alone 21 bird species have gone extinct. This is much greater than the calculated natural extinction rate of 1 species every 100 years (BirdLife), and many more species are sure to follow. The many threats faced by birds are not limited to particular regions or countries, but are global. That means bird decline is occurring right on our doorsteps, and some fear (perhaps unrealistically) that we may one-day face a future of empty and silent skies if these issues are not addressed.

To sum this introduction up, I'll finish by saying that this is my first time addressing and expressing my thoughts on what I believe is a serious matter. I openly welcome any comments, critiques, suggestions or discussions. Hopefully I will learn a lot along my assigned journey, and I hope that you'll all enjoy reading and learning with me!


Other reads: