Until mid-to-late July, South Stack cliffs host to around 10,000 breeding birds; mostly guillemots, but approximately 1,500 razorbills too, along with a handful of other birds such as puffins, kittiwakes and fulmar.
Who are you calling a penguin?! Razorbills (Alca torda) on South Stack Cliffs. The guillemots and razorbills spend their lives at sea, and only venture onto land to breed. |
A reduction in the sandeels available with not only effect species of seabirds -Kittiwakes in particular-, but also marine mammals such as harbour porpoises (MacLeod et al, 2007) and up to 10 species of predatory fish (van Deurs et al, 2009). Sadly, sandeel populations have been declining in number, and this in turn has been linked to a reduction in sea-bird populations which struggle to feed themselves and their young. Between 1986 and 2011, the number of seabirds breeding around Scotland decreased by 53%, and the decline is believed to be due to a drop in sandeel availability (Herald Scotland, 2012).
So, where are all the sandeels going?
The population decline of the sandeels has been linked to two anthropogenic causes:
- Climate change, resulting in a warming of the UK coastal waters since 1980 of up 1°C per decade (Wanless et al, 2010).
- Over-fishing for commercial purposes, such as for fish-meal feed and fertiliser.
Sandeel population decline has been correlated with rising sea temperatures by several authors (Wanless et al, 2010) (Heath et al. 2012). As the seas warm, the cold-water zooplankton that the sandeels feed upon are replaced by less nutritious warm-water varieties (Wanless et al, 2010). Though the cold-water species are still found in cooler, deeper waters, the habitat restriction of the sandeels means they cannot follow the cold-water zooplankton as they migrate (Heath et al. 2012). As a result, the sandeel populations experience a decline.
Rising sea levels are also thought to be posing a threat to the sandeels, though overall the effects of anthropogenic climate change on Ammodytes is not fully understood, and research is still ongoing as a result.
Rising sea levels are also thought to be posing a threat to the sandeels, though overall the effects of anthropogenic climate change on Ammodytes is not fully understood, and research is still ongoing as a result.
Whilst over-fishing is not thought to be the primary cause of sandeel decline, it makes it harder for the climate-hit sandeels to fight back. In turn, this affects seabirds; Sandeel exploitation has been linked to declining kittiwake colonies near to fishing grounds.
Plans were announced in November 2012 to halt the decline in seabird numbers (Scottish Seabird Centre). One of these plans involved the inclusion of sandeel habitats in the Scottish Government's Marine Scotland agency's network of Marine Protected Areas where there are imposed fishing limits. It is hoped that these fishing limits will halt the decline in sandeel numbers, which in turn is anticipated to stem the decline in seabird populations.
Another interesting blog post Sam! I actually read about this in the news quite recently. You might find this poster from Marine Scotland interesting. http://www.strath.ac.uk/media/departments/mathematics/research/groups/fisheries/posters/research_day_2010_sandeel_poster_heath.pdf
ReplyDeleteI think scientists first believed that sand eel population were declining because of an increase in early stage larval mortality rates. But recent research has shown larval survival rates are increasing, as overall stocks decline. Apparently its because of warming sea temperatures altering the hibernating habitats of the sand eels and reducing the amount of time they can survive without food. Would be interested to hear your opinion about this? And do you think that populations will adapt to these changes? Or are we causing a fundamental shift in the balance of the ecosystem?